Tim Scott

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Updated u-boot support? #6085
    Tim Scott
    Participant

    Just wanted to post a quick update. I’m able to successfully run v2012.10 using the patch changes Jesse linked above. I can attach a USB thumb drive and download a file to that using USB / fatload commands. I was able to re-flash my MT100 using this and things are working well so far.

    I seem to have taken a step back trying to run the latest version of U-boot, however. I applied the same patch changes to v2015.01-rc1 and the boot process appears to get hung up before it hits the prompt:

    ## Starting application at 0x21400000 …

    U-Boot 2015.01-rc1-dirty (Nov 17 2014 – 10:30:52)

    CPU: AT91SAM9G20
    Crystal frequency: 18.432 MHz
    CPU clock : 396.288 MHz
    Master clock : 132.096 MHz
    DRAM: 64 MiB
    WARNING: Caches not enabled

    At this point things hang indefinitely. Since I’ve got v2012.10 working, I can proceed with what I was originally working on. Still, it would be nice to know what the hang-up is for the latest version of U-boot. If I get anything figured out, I’ll be sure to post it here. If anyone has ideas for troubleshooting, I’d be interested to hear them.

    Thanks!
    –tim

    in reply to: Updated u-boot support? #6082
    Tim Scott
    Participant

    Does anyone know if it is possible to recover an incorrectly programmed flash using the MT100EOCG-DK? I found the link below, but it applies to a different board altogether:

    Home

    My board is working fine at the moment. I’d just like to know how to resolve a bricked unit in case something goes bad with my u-boot update.

    Found the answer in S000516C. Looks like I just need to short out R108 on the MT100 board and run the ATMEL software. Sweet!

    Thanks,
    –tim

    • This reply was modified 10 years ago by Tim Scott.
    • This reply was modified 10 years ago by Tim Scott.
    in reply to: Updated u-boot support? #6081
    Tim Scott
    Participant

    Yep, that makes sense. For test purposes, I think loading in the .bin to RAM and running things that way will help prevent from bricking accidentally bricking the unit.

    FWIW, I have the first pass of U-Boot v2014.10 working on the board. Ethernet doesn’t appear to function yet so I’ll be digging into that today.

    –tim

    in reply to: Updated u-boot support? #6078
    Tim Scott
    Participant

    Sweet. I recompiled U-boot v2012.10 with the patch, but changed then CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE to 0x21400000 and was able to load / execute the .bin file just fine. I plan on investigating whether or not I can get the latest version of U-Boot running in a similar manner.

    –tim

    in reply to: Updated u-boot support? #6075
    Tim Scott
    Participant

    Hi Jesse,

    I think I may be deploying my u-boot.bin file to the target incorrectly. I can’t load it at 0x23F00000 because that is where the existing u-boot resides, so it freezes if I try to do that. If I load things at 0x21400000 and follow that with a “go 0x2140000” I encounter the freeze as mentioned in my original post. I’m guessing this may be due to the CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE setting.

    How did you test your u-boot build?

    Thanks,
    –tim

    in reply to: BuildRoot and OCG #5801
    Tim Scott
    Participant

    I haven’t messed with the GPIOs so I haven’t verified them. GPS works fine — either through Minicom or the recompilation of Venus GPS.

    –tim

    in reply to: Error executing "bitbake corecdp-base-image" #5716
    Tim Scott
    Participant

    I similarly tried to get things to run using VirtualBox running an image of 11.04. For me, I couldn’t even get past the pre-requisites step… apt-get failed miserably due to certain packages no longer being available on the Ubuntu servers. I rolled things back to an image of 10.04 LTS and was able to finally get the necessary pre-reqs installed and bitbake to work.

    That said, I’m now using buildroot instead of bitbake to create my kernel and file system images. If you’re interested, I created another thread in the “MultiConnect OCG” forum about that.

    Cheers,
    –tim

Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)