[Brian]

Also, when connecting on port 5000, do I issue my own AT commands to send text messages?

What about receiving messages? Will the Admin UI still record “Inbox” text messages even though I am using port 5000?

Ultimately, I’d like the Admin UI completely out of the picture.

Thanks,

Brian

[Brian]

Hi Byron,

Thanks for the reply.

I’m mostly interested in fixing some long standing problems with the firmware.

I know you’ve made improvements to the firmware for these devices, but I’d like to create a stripped down version of the firmware without the Admin UI & features which I don’t need. I’d like to build a RESTful JSON API on top of these modems which is more compatible with my systems level integration that I’m doing.

The MultiConnect OCG is nice product but I’ve already purchased the SF100 & SF800 equipment a few years ago. That’s probably not going to help my situation unless I’m willing to spend more money. The SF800 over $1,000.

I’d really appreciate it if you could put some effort finding the legal status of the firmware’s compliance with the GPL.

# uname -a

Linux MultiModemiSMS 2.4.27-uc1 #85 Thu Nov 18 10:58:21 CST 2010 armv5b unknown



# cat /proc/version

Linux version 2.4.27-uc1 (rcrogers@ubudev) (gcc version 3.3.6) #85 Thu Nov 18 10:58:21 CST 2010



# busybox --help

BusyBox v1.00 (2010.11.18-17:03+0000) multi-call binary

I’m not looking to cause trouble but if MultiTech is distributing GPL’ed code, MultiTech should be distributing the source along with it; otherwise, I think it’s considered a violation of the GPL.

Ultimately don’t want it to come down to reporting a potential GPL violation … please understand, I just simply want the source code that’s being used so I can make my own modifications and improvements.

Thanks,

Brian

[Author]

Posts