Precise timestamping from the packet forwarder
Home › Forums › Conduit: AEP Model › Precise timestamping from the packet forwarder
Tagged: packet forwarder precise time
- This topic has 11 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 6 years ago by
Christopher Hunt.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 15, 2019 at 4:08 pm #27256
Christopher Hunt
ParticipantHi there,
We have a new IP67 Conduit with AEP installed. I was wondering if there’s supposed to be support for the precise timestamping of packets received by the packet forwarder. Normally, these packets are forwarded on using the
time
field in the JSONrxpk
object. I’ve begun tracing packets to see, but I suspect that thetime
field isn’t being provided, or if it is, then it isn’t precise.Thanks for any clarification.
Cheers,
-CFebruary 15, 2019 at 4:47 pm #27257Steve Kovarik
ModeratorHello -C
IP67 Conduits with AEP do not support precise time stamping.
Currently only mLinux models MTCDTIP-xxx-275L-xxx support precise
time stamping for geolocation using TDoA.-Best Regards
February 15, 2019 at 5:02 pm #27258Christopher Hunt
ParticipantHi Steve,
Thanks so much for the fast reply. Is the lack of precise time stamping a hardware limitation or software?
Kind regards,
ChristopherFebruary 15, 2019 at 5:45 pm #27259Steve Kovarik
ModeratorHi Christopher
Precise time stamp models are different hardware.
Why/what do you need precise time stamp for?-Best Regards
February 15, 2019 at 6:25 pm #27260Christopher Hunt
ParticipantHi Steve,
Without precise timestamps, the Multitech and other networking hardware that it is connected to is, of course, subject to clock drift. Unless NTP is available then the observation times will be incorrect.
NTP and the internet, in general, cannot be assumed to be available for us. One of our projects in flight targets some sub-antarctic islands off New Zealand. There is no internet other than the occasional, assumed-unreliable satellite connectivity. Plenty of time for clock drift.
HTH.
Cheers,
-CFebruary 15, 2019 at 10:53 pm #27261Christopher Hunt
ParticipantHang on, shouldn’t I be able to use the GPS time (
tmms
field)? While not quite precise, it is certainly reasonable.`
tmms | number | GPS time of pkt RX, number of milliseconds since 06.Jan.1980
`
March 22, 2019 at 4:03 pm #27511Christopher Hunt
ParticipantI’ve deployed our most recent Network Server that now takes advantage of
tmms
. However, I’m not seeing that field come in either. Can you please advise on how I may receive the GPS time with a packet forwarder receive packet?March 22, 2019 at 6:25 pm #27512Jason Reiss
KeymasterSee AEP 1.7.2 or mLinux 4.1.6 on downloads page to use gpsd for time sync and packet forwarder timestamps.
March 22, 2019 at 9:16 pm #27513Christopher Hunt
ParticipantThanks Jason. I’ll look at upgrading the firmware. So, just to confirm, I should expect to see the
tmms
field populated by the packet forward along with its receive packets…?March 22, 2019 at 11:27 pm #27514Christopher Hunt
ParticipantI just tried upgrading to 1.7.2 from 1.6.4 via a reliable LAN connection. No cigar. I then thought, perhaps try 1.7.0 first. No cigar. Each time the UI reported that there was some error half way through uploading the firmware.
I then had to power-cycle the Multitech Conduit to recover. This is using AEP. Any further advice? Thanks.
March 25, 2019 at 8:06 am #27517Jason Reiss
KeymasterDid you try the upgrade after a reboot?
April 3, 2019 at 1:37 am #27592Christopher Hunt
ParticipantYes, I did try the upgrade after a reboot.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.